On August 5, 2026, the Department of State said consular officers may now require certain immigrant visa applicants to apply for a public charge bond with USCIS. If you have an immigrant visa case pending at a U.S. embassy or consulate — family, employment, or investment — this changes what a public charge refusal can mean for you.
What the Department of State Announced
The notice is short. It appears on the Department's visa news page as Public Charge Bonds for Immigrant Visa Applicants, and it says the Department has implemented a procedure permitting consular officers to require certain immigrant visa applicants to apply for a public charge bond with USCIS. The Department calls it a pilot program.
The framing matters. The Department presents the bond as one more way to overcome a public charge refusal, not as a new obstacle. An applicant refused on that ground can still submit evidence that they are not likely to become a public charge. The bond is a second route. If it is approved, a consular officer may issue an immigrant visa previously denied under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act — provided the applicant is otherwise eligible.
The Legal Ground Behind It
INA 212(a)(4), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4), makes anyone applying for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status inadmissible if, in the opinion of the consular officer or immigration officer, they are likely at any time to become a public charge.
The statute never defines "public charge." What it does instead is tell officers what they have to look at, at a minimum: age; health; family status; assets, resources, and financial status; and education and skills.
Officers may also consider an Affidavit of Support, Form I-864, submitted on the applicant's behalf. That is INA 212(a)(4)(B)(ii). And under INA 212(a)(4)(C) and (D), most family-based immigrant visa applicants and certain employment-based applicants have to submit a sufficient Form I-864 to avoid a public charge finding in the first place — which is where the great majority of these cases are actually won or lost.
What a Public Charge Bond Is
INA 213, 8 U.S.C. 1183, lets the Secretary of Homeland Security admit someone who is inadmissible only on the public charge ground, upon the giving of a suitable and proper bond approved by the Secretary. The implementing regulation is 8 CFR 213.1.
A bond is not a fee. It is not a payment to the government at all. It is a security instrument — a cash deposit or a surety bond — posted by an obligor, who might be the applicant or someone acting for them. It sits with USCIS as a guarantee. Satisfy the conditions and the money comes back. Miss them and it is forfeited in full.
Why This Is New
The authority itself is not new. 8 CFR 213.1(b) already says USCIS may accept a public charge bond before an immigrant visa is issued — either on a request from a U.S. consular officer, or when an interested person presents a notification from the officer requiring the bond. USCIS then notifies the officer who asked for it, with the date and place of acceptance and the amount.
That paragraph has been sitting there unused, more or less. In practice, public charge bonds have been an adjustment of status phenomenon, handled by USCIS inside the United States. What changed on August 5 is that the Department is actually reaching for the consular half of the regulation.
How the Process Works
The order of operations is worth getting straight. The consular officer adjudicates the immigrant visa application and refuses it under INA 212(a)(4). If the officer decides a bond is appropriate, the officer notifies the applicant and sets the amount. The bond is applied for with USCIS. If USCIS accepts it, USCIS notifies the post. The consular officer may then issue the visa, assuming the applicant is otherwise eligible.
The bond is USCIS's Form I-945, Public Charge Bond — the page the Department sends applicants to. Under 8 CFR 213.1(c) the bond has to be executed on a form USCIS designates, and USCIS issues a receipt to the applicant or to whoever posted it on their behalf.
How Much the Bond Will Be
The Department's FAQ says the consular officer sets the amount under 8 CFR 213.1(b), based on the totality of the circumstances of each case.
There is a floor and no published ceiling. 8 CFR 213.1(c) requires the bond be in the sum the officer sets, but not less than $1,000. The regulation stops there, and the Department has not published a schedule of amounts.
Two Limits Worth Reading Carefully
First: this is running on select applications, and the Department says applicants required to post a bond will be notified by a consular officer. There is nothing to apply for and no way to ask for bond treatment in advance. USCIS's instructions for Form I-945 line up with that — the form is only for people who were found inadmissible on public charge grounds and then told a bond may be submitted. File it uninvited and it gets rejected.
Second: the Department addressed existing visas head-on. The new procedure does not affect any currently valid visa.
What Breaches the Bond, and Why September 18, 2026 Matters
This is the part I would want a client reading twice, because the breach rules are about to change and the change turns on a date.
DHS's final rule Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility, 91 FR 45324 (July 20, 2026), rescinds the 2022 public charge regulation. It also rewrites the breach and cancellation provisions at 8 CFR 103.6(c)(1). Effective date: September 18, 2026.
A bond submitted on or after September 18, 2026 is breached if the bonded person receives any means-tested public benefit before death, permanent departure, or naturalization — or is otherwise noncompliant with any condition of the bond.
A bond submitted before September 18, 2026 is breached under the older, narrower standard: receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance or long-term institutionalization at government expense, or noncompliance with any bond condition.
That is a wide gap between two standards, separated by a single day, and commenters on the rule said so. DHS's answer was that it had to conform the bond provisions to the rescission or the two would be inconsistent, and that the new language states the breach standard clearly.
DHS was equally direct about what a breach costs: the full face value of the bond, forfeited, as liquidated damages. Its reasoning was that the damages are hard to calculate and run past the value of the benefits themselves, taking in the administering agency's overhead too.
Getting the Money Back
Yes, the money can come back. The Department's FAQ says so and points to USCIS's Policy Manual guidance on maintaining, substituting, and canceling bonds.
Under 8 CFR 103.6(c)(1)(i), a bond may be cancelled after a proper cancellation request is filed on a USCIS-designated form — Form I-356, Request for Cancellation of Public Charge Bond. Until that form is filed and USCIS reviews the evidence and decides, the bond stays in effect. It does not lapse on its own.
The grounds for cancellation: the bonded person dies, permanently departs the United States, or naturalizes, provided the bond was not breached; substitution of another bond; or cancellation by USCIS on review following the fifth anniversary of the person's admission or adjustment of status, provided a cancellation request was filed, all conditions were met, and USCIS finds no breach. Someone entering on an immigrant visa starts that five-year clock at admission.
Substitution deserves a second look. USCIS lets an obligor be swapped out — better financial terms, or the original obligor simply wants out — but the substitute bond has to cover every liability the first obligor incurred, including a breach that happened before the substitution was accepted. Read that before you agree to be anyone's replacement obligor.
If a Breach Is Declared
USCIS does not declare a breach quietly. It issues a Notice of Intent to Declare the Public Charge Bond Breached to the obligor, specific enough to allow a real response, with the supporting documentation it may lawfully disclose and a deadline for rebuttal evidence. Copies go to the bonded person and their representative.
If the response does not overcome the initial determination, USCIS declares the bond breached. Under the amended 8 CFR 103.6(c)(1)(ii), a final breach determination may be appealed by a surety under 8 CFR 103.6(f), or by the noncitizen under 8 CFR 103.3.
Where This Fits
It does not arrive in isolation. In February 2026 the Department announced immigrant visa processing updates for nationalities it identified as at high risk of public benefits reliance. It also made its visa bond program permanent for certain nonimmigrant applicants — a separate program with different mechanics, which we covered in our post on the visa bond rule. And the DHS rescission taking effect September 18, 2026 resets how public charge determinations get made in the first place, which we wrote about in our post on the rescission.
What to Do Now
If you have an immigrant visa interview scheduled, treat the Affidavit of Support as the main event. A sufficient, well-documented Form I-864 with a qualified sponsor is still how most family-based applicants avoid a public charge finding at all. A bond is a fallback after a refusal, not a substitute for a strong filing.
Document the factors the statute names. Age, health, family status, assets and resources, education and skills. Those are what the officer must weigh, and evidence on each is what a response to a public charge refusal is built from.
If a consular officer tells you a bond is required, get advice before you post it. The amount is discretionary, the obligor takes on real liability, and the breach rules turn on the date the bond is submitted.
Do not file Form I-945 on your own initiative. It will be rejected. USCIS requires the notice telling you to file, plus the specified amount.
If a bond is posted for you, get the conditions in writing. Which benefits are at issue, who is covered, what triggers cancellation — before anyone in the household enrolls in anything.
The Department has published a pilot notice and not much else, and the details are still being clarified. At Parikh & Prasad, PC, our attorneys follow these developments closely and can review how they apply to a specific case. Contact us to schedule a consultation.
This post is attorney advertising and is provided for general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Immigration law changes rapidly; consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific situation.
Related Practice Areas
Speak directly with an attorney
Schedule a free 15-minute consultation to discuss your immigration matter — no obligation.
Schedule a Free Consultation